Why Your Activity Tracker Isn't As Accurate As You Think

Activity trackers are everywhere these days, promising to help you stay on top of your fitness game by tracking steps, calories, heart rate, and even sleep. But here’s the deal—while they offer some pretty cool features, most of these devices just aren’t as accurate as you might think. So today, we’re going to dig into why your tracker might be a little off and how to use it effectively anyway.

How Activity Trackers Actually Work

Most activity trackers rely on a handful of sensors like accelerometers, gyroscopes, heart rate monitors, and sometimes GPS to measure your movements and estimate things like steps, distance, and calories burned.

• Accelerometers track motion and speed, figuring out how many steps you take.
• Gyroscopes sense rotational movement, helping detect changes in orientation.
• Heart Rate Monitors use optical sensors to estimate your heart rate based on blood flow under the skin.
• GPS tracks where you are and how far you’ve traveled.
• Altimeters measure elevation to track activities like climbing stairs or hiking.

These sensors, paired with algorithms, crank out data on your steps, calories burned, and even sleep patterns. But, here’s the catch: each of these sensors and algorithms comes with limitations.

Why Your Tracker Might Be Off

1. Sensor Limitations Accelerometers and gyroscopes do a decent job tracking basic movements, but they can miss the mark when things get a little more complicated. For example, walking on a treadmill while holding the rails? Good luck getting an accurate step count because the sensor isn’t picking up arm movements.

2. Heart Rate Monitoring Challenges Wrist-worn heart rate monitors—especially the optical ones—have their own problems. Factors like wrist placement, skin tone, sweat, and even tattoos can mess with the readings. And during high-intensity activities, like sprinting or HIIT workouts, the rapid movement often makes heart rate readings bounce all over the place.

3. GPS Struggles GPS is great in open areas, but in cities with tall buildings or heavily wooded areas? Not so much. This can lead to a zigzag pattern on your route and make it look like you covered more (or less) ground than you actually did.

4. Algorithms Aren’t Perfect The algorithms that interpret all this sensor data are based on averages and generalizations. That means your calorie burn, sleep quality, and even step count can be way off if your movement patterns or metabolism don’t fit the algorithm’s model.

Common Inaccuracies in Activity Trackers

Let’s talk specifics. Here are some common areas where trackers often fall short:

• Step Counting: Your tracker can mistake cycling or even driving for walking due to wrist movement. And if your stride length or speed varies, that can also throw off your step count.

• Calorie Burn: Trackers estimate calories based on steps, heart rate, and user data like age and weight. But your actual calorie burn can vary depending on your fitness level, body composition, and type of activity.

• Heart Rate: Optical sensors are notorious for being inaccurate during high-intensity workouts. Sudden spikes or drops in heart rate can give you the wrong idea about your workout intensity.

• Sleep Tracking: Most trackers can’t accurately distinguish between different sleep stages like REM, deep sleep, or light sleep, leading to unreliable sleep quality assessments.

How to Get the Most Out of Your Tracker

Even with these flaws, activity trackers can still be a solid tool for tracking your fitness if you know how to work around their limitations. Here’s how to make the most of what you’ve got:

1. Use Multiple Metrics: Don’t rely on just one metric (like step count). Look at the bigger picture by considering calories, heart rate, and activity duration together.

2. Calibrate Regularly: Some trackers let you calibrate things like step length and heart rate zones. Take the time to fine-tune these settings for better accuracy.

3. Understand the Margin of Error: These gadgets give you estimates, not exact numbers. Use them to track trends over time rather than getting hung up on daily fluctuations.

4. Pair with Other Tools: Complement your tracker’s data with things like manual heart rate monitors, food diaries, or professional fitness assessments to get a more accurate picture of your health.

5. Proper Placement: Where you wear your tracker matters. For heart rate accuracy, make sure it’s snug on your wrist. For steps, some trackers might work better on your hip or in your pocket.

The Role of AI in Improving Accuracy

As AI and machine learning continue to evolve, activity trackers are starting to get smarter. By analyzing tons of data on movement patterns and physiology, AI can help refine algorithms and make them more personalized to your specific profile.

• Example: AI could learn your individual walking and running patterns, adjusting step and calorie estimates to better reflect your actual activity.

What the Future Holds for Activity Trackers

Activity trackers aren’t going anywhere, and the technology is only going to get better. Here’s what we can expect:

1. Better Sensors: We’re already seeing new sensors that can measure things like blood oxygen levels, hydration, and stress. These will add a whole new dimension to tracking.

2. Smarter Algorithms: AI-driven insights are going to become more personalized, offering better accuracy by factoring in individual differences in metabolism and movement patterns.

3. Seamless Integration: Expect better integration with other health monitoring tools like smart scales, blood pressure monitors, and even sleep trackers, giving you a more complete view of your health.

4. Innovative Wearables: Think beyond wristbands. We’re talking smart clothing and health patches that track even more metrics with greater accuracy and convenience.

The Bottom Line

Most activity trackers aren’t perfect. But that doesn’t mean they’re useless. When used wisely, they can still provide valuable insights into your fitness progress. The key is to understand their limitations, focus on long-term trends rather than daily numbers, and complement tracker data with other health and fitness tools.

In the end, your activity tracker is just one piece of the puzzle. Use it as part of a broader strategy to keep pushing yourself forward and reaching those performance goals.

About The Author

Matt Mosman (MS, CISSN, CSCS) is a research scientist, endurance athlete, and the founder of the supplement company Simply Good Supplements. Matt holds his B.S. in Exercise Science from Creighton University and his M.S. in Exercise Physiology from the University of California.  Matt and his family reside in Spearfish South Dakota, where they enjoy running, mountain biking, camping, and all the outdoor adventures Spearfish has to offer.

References:

1. Evenson, K. R., Goto, M. M., & Furberg, R. D. (2015). Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 159.
2. Shcherbina, A., Mattsson, C. M., Waggott, D., Salisbury, H., Christle, J. W., Hastie, T., & Wheeler, M. T. (2017). Accuracy in wrist-worn, sensor-based measurements of heart rate and energy expenditure in a diverse cohort. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 7(2), 3.
3. Boudreaux, B. D., Hebert, E. P., Hollander, D. B., Williams, B. M., Cormier, C. L., Naquin, M. R., & Gillan, W. W. (2018). Validity of Wearable Activity Monitors during Cycling and Resistance Exercise. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 50(3), 624-633.
4. Nelson, M. B., Kaminsky, L. A., Dickin, D. C., & Montoye, A. H. (2016). Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors for Specific Activity Types. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 48(8), 1619-1628.
5. Stahl, S. E., An, H. S., Dinkel, D. M., Noble, J. M., & Lee, J. M. (2016). How accurate are the wrist-based heart rate monitors during walking and running activities? Are they accurate enough? BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 2(1), e000106.